Building aviation-grade battery propulsion systems that can actually earn FAA certification — the hardest gate in electric aviation.
Electric Power Systems (EPS)
venture active confidence: Medium status: Draft updated 2026-07-14
Summary
Electric Power Systems (EPS) is a North Logan, Utah company building aviation-certified electric propulsion systems for the eVTOL and electric aircraft market. The impact case is structural: EPS is an infrastructure layer. Every eVTOL program blocked on propulsion is, in part, blocked waiting for companies like EPS to clear the certification path.
Impact
The impact case is structural: EPS is an infrastructure layer. Every eVTOL program blocked on propulsion is, in part, blocked waiting for companies like EPS to clear the certification path. If EPiC 2.0 achieves FAA certification, it unlocks a cohort of aircraft programs that are currently stalled at "powered by non-certified batteries."
The 2034 Winter Olympics in Utah creates a concrete near-term forcing function. Utah is actively standing up eVTOL infrastructure as part of that planning cycle, and EPS is positioned as a core propulsion supplier in that regional ecosystem.
Aviation certification is not an incremental improvement — it is a binary gate. EPS passing major NASA thermal safety milestones and actively pursuing FAA certification is a meaningful signal that the company is solving the real problem rather than building around it.
What They Are Building
EPS builds the EPiC battery system: an aviation-grade lithium-based battery and power management platform engineered from the ground up for flight certification. EPiC 2.0 targets 90+ minutes of flight time and is being designed to meet FAA thermal runaway containment, cycle life, and failure mode requirements.
The core technical challenge is energy density versus safety. Aviation certification requires that a battery not only perform at spec but fail in a controlled, predictable, and survivable way — a constraint that rules out most consumer-grade chemistries and cell formats. EPS has cleared major NASA thermal safety milestones, meaning the failure behavior of their cells under abnormal conditions has been independently validated.
Secondary products include the power electronics and battery management systems needed to integrate EPiC into aircraft platforms.
What They Need Now
Likely needs include aerospace battery electrochemists, power electronics engineers, certification engineers with FAA DER experience, systems engineers familiar with aviation safety standards (DO-178C, DO-254, ARP4754A), and manufacturing engineers capable of building aviation-grade hardware at production scale. The team appears to be Utah-based and smaller than coastal counterparts, making individual contributions highly visible.
Who Could Help
Useful helpers include FAA designees (DERs) with battery or propulsion system experience, aerospace OEM partnerships (eVTOL manufacturers looking for a certifiable propulsion source), DOE or DoD propulsion program contacts, and Utah aerospace ecosystem connectors through 47G.
Utah Context
EPS is part of a growing Utah aerospace and eVTOL cluster anchored by the 2034 Winter Olympics planning process. A reported state incentive package signals that Utah is treating electric aviation propulsion as a strategic economic development priority, but its value and structure need a captured state record. North Logan places EPS near Utah State University, though no deep research affiliation has been found — the company appears to be more engineering execution than fundamental research spinout.
Evidence
See Also
- WAVE (Wireless Advanced Vehicle Electrification) — another Utah-based EV-infrastructure company with USU engineering DNA
- Jump Aero — eVTOL EMS application that represents a key use-case for certifiable propulsion systems
Open Questions
- What is EPS's current FAA certification timeline and which specific certification basis (14 CFR Part 21, ASTM standards) are they pursuing?
- Which customer contracts are confirmed vs. in negotiation post-EPiC 2.0 announcement?
- What is the verified value and structure of the state incentive — grants, tax credits, or infrastructure investment?
- What is the competitive position relative to ZeroAvia, magniX, and other propulsion providers as the eVTOL market consolidates?