Parsons Behle & Latimer Official Website

source confidence: Medium status: Useful updated 2026-06-18

Type
source
Status
Useful
Confidence
Medium
Source Type
official-page
URL
https://parsonsbehle.com/
Archive
https://web.archive.org/web/20260802052016/https://parsonsbehle.com/
Archived
2026-08-02
Publisher
Parsons Behle & Latimer
Raw
raw/parsons-behle-latimer-official-website/2026-08-11-3656fade9f5c.txt
Retrieved
2026-08-12
Updated
2026-06-18

Summary

Parsons Behle & Latimer's official website describes a regional law firm with a Salt Lake City office (plus offices in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming/Jackson, and elsewhere in the Mountain West). Its capability pages cover technology, intellectual property, securities and capital markets, and emerging companies.

Useful Claims

  • The current capture identifies offices across the Intermountain West, including Lehi, Park City, St. George, and Salt Lake City in Utah.
  • The homepage describes recent Utah transactional work, including advising Salt Lake City-based Spectrum Engineers in a three-party business combination.
  • Earlier claims about technology/IP, securities, emerging-company, and trademark-recognition practices are not present in the captured homepage and require captures of the underlying capability pages.

Verbatim

"Rooted in the Intermountain West Boise Helena Idaho Falls Jackson Lehi Missoula Park City Reno Rexburg St. George Salt Lake City" — Home page, offices

"Parsons Behle & Latimer advised Spectrum Engineers, a leading middle-market engineering firm headquartered in Salt Lake City, as the lead party in a tri-party business combination involving Envision Engineering and Colvin Engineering to form Lynk Engineers." — Home page, recent work

Reliability Notes

Official, self-published firm source. Strong for stated capabilities, office footprint, and named practice areas; weaker as neutral proof of outcomes. Specific deal references on the site are firm-reported.

The 2026-08-11 capture is the general homepage, not the capability pages that apparently supported the earlier detailed practice claims. Those claims were not reconfirmed from this artifact.

Related Pages